New Delhi, Aug 2 (IANS) In a significant move aimed at upholding constitutional values of equality and dignity, the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has issued notices to the Department of Posts and the Principal Secretaries of Urban Development and Panchayati Raj Departments across all States and Union Territories, calling for a detailed Action Taken Report (ATR) regarding the continued use of caste-indicative and derogatory names for villages, localities, settlements, and streets across the country.

The matter was brought before the NHRC through a complaint dated July 10, 2025, and considered by the Commission on July 28.

The complainant had raised serious concerns about the persistence of offensive nomenclature that reflects caste-based discrimination.

The Commission noted that such names violate the constitutional ideals of equality and human dignity, and contribute to the continued social stigma faced by the Scheduled Castes, even after over 7 decades of Independence.

Taking cognisance under Section 12 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, a Bench presided over by NHRC Member Priyank Kanoongo directed the issuance of a formal notice.

The Commission emphasised that the NHRC is empowered under the Act to investigate such matters with the authority of a civil court.

The NHRC stated: “The complainant has urged that such names be reviewed and renamed, as they are offensive and contrary to the constitutional ideals of equality and human dignity.”

The Commission also cited several key legal and administrative references to support its directive. These include a 1990 circular from the Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment instructing all governments to discontinue the use of the word ‘Harijan’, and a 1982 Ministry of Home Affairs directive banning the use of both ‘Harijan’ and ‘Girijan.’

States like Odisha, Maharashtra, Karnataka, Delhi, Punjab, and Kerala have already taken steps to enforce constitutionally-appropriate terminology.

Further, the NHRC highlighted the Supreme Court’s 2017 ruling in Manju Devi vs. Onkarjit Singh Ahluwalia & Others, which observed that caste-referential terms such as ‘Harijan’ and ‘Dhobi’ could constitute social insult or abuse.

The SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, particularly Section 3(1)(u), also criminalises the use of caste-based slurs, naming terms like ‘Chamar’, ‘Bhangi’, and ‘Mehtar’ as punishable offenses.

The Commission also referenced a 2024 Supreme Court order in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) directing the government to consider removing casteist terms such as ‘Chamar’, ‘Kanjar’, ‘Chuhra’, and ‘Bhangi’ from official records.

In its directive, the NHRC has asked all concerned authorities to compile and submit a list of towns, villages, panchayats, and other public spaces that still carry caste-indicative or derogatory names.

It has also requested a report on the measures being taken to rename or remove such terms. The deadline for submission is four weeks from the date of notice.

The Commission aims to address systemic discrimination embedded in geographical and administrative nomenclature, and to ensure that public spaces reflect the values enshrined in the Indian Constitution.

–IANS

rs/rad