• About Us
  • Our Editorial Policy
  • Business Directory
  • Advertise with Us
  • Our Advertisers
  • Contact Us
Australia India News
India News Australia
  • Home
  • Current Issue
    Past Issue
  • India News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • World
    World This Week
  • Community News
  • What's On
  • Others
    Yoga in Australia News COVID-19 Community News Naari IPL News Health Travel Entertainment
  • Migrants Expo
  • National Events
  • Please wait..
India News News

Plea in SC against anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand in POCSO case

  • BY India News Newsdesk
  • March 26, 2026
  • 0 COMMENTS

New Delhi, March 26 (IANS) Spiritual leader Ashutosh Brahmachari Maharaj has moved the Supreme Court, challenging the anticipatory bail granted by the Allahabad High Court to Jyotish Peeth Shankaracharya Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati and his disciple Mukundanand Giri in connection with a child sexual abuse complaint registered by the Uttar Pradesh Police.

As per the case details reflected on the official website, a Special Leave Petition (SLP) was filed on Thursday before the apex court seeking cancellation of the relief granted to the accused.

The SLP prays to set aside the order of the Allahabad High Court, which granted pre-arrest bail to the Hindu seer and his co-accused in connection with a case registered at the Jhunsi Police Station in Prayagraj under the provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

Granting relief, the Allahabad High Court, in its March 25 order, had said that “considering the above factual matrix and without expressing any opinion on its merits, a case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out”.

A single-judge bench of Justice Jitendra Kumar Sinha also directed that in the event of arrest, the accused be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs 50,000 with two sureties each, subject to conditions, including cooperation with the investigation and non-interference with witnesses.

The relief order had recorded several inconsistencies in the prosecution case, including delay in lodging the complaint and contradictions in the statements of the alleged victims regarding the place and timing of the incidents.

The Allahabad High Court recorded several inconsistencies in the prosecution case, including delay in lodging the complaint and contradictions in the statements of the alleged victims regarding the place and timing of the incidents.

It said that the first informant, who claims to be the guardian of the victims, received information about the alleged offence on January 18, 2026, but reported it to the police only after a delay of six days, citing his engagement in “pooja/yagya”.

Significantly, Justice Sinha had also restrained the applicants, victims and the first informant from giving media interviews during the pendency of investigation and trial.

The case stems from allegations of sexual abuse of minors under the POCSO Act, based on a complaint filed by Ashutosh Brahmachari, following which a Special POCSO court had directed registration of an FIR in February this year.

Earlier, on February 27, the Allahabad High Court had granted interim protection from arrest to Swami Avimukteshwaranand and directed them to cooperate with the ongoing investigation.

During the proceedings, the accused had claimed false implication, saying that there were inconsistencies in the statements of the alleged victims, delay in lodging the complaint, and absence of corroborative medical evidence.

Opposing the plea, the Uttar Pradesh government and the complainant said that the allegations were serious in nature and custodial interrogation was necessary, while also expressing apprehension that the accused could influence witnesses.

Opposing the plea, the Uttar Pradesh government and the complainant added that the allegations were serious in nature and custodial interrogation was necessary, while also expressing apprehension that the accused could influence witnesses.

Meanwhile, Samajwadi Party Chief Akhilesh Yadav said that the FIR against Swami Avimukteshwaranand appeared politically motivated and aimed at tarnishing the image of a prominent Hindu seer.

He alleged the move was driven by malice following the controversy during the Magh Mela and warned that such actions could deepen tensions in Uttar Pradesh, especially ahead of elections, while eroding public trust in the administration.

–IANS

pds/khz

Post navigation

Assam CM Sarma already accepted defeat, seeks votes in the name of religion and Pakistan: Alka Lamba
Bengal polls: Panihati set for triangular contest as BJP fields RG Kar victim’s mother

Related Post

Karnataka leadership crisis: Congress high command summons CM Siddaramaiah to Delhi
May 25, 2026
Karnataka leadership crisis: Congress high command summons CM Siddaramaiah to Delhi
May 25, 2026
Karnataka leadership crisis: Congress high command summons CM Siddaramaiah to Delhi
May 25, 2026
Karnataka leadership crisis: Congress high command summons CM Siddaramaiah to Delhi
May 25, 2026

Our Current Issue

Australia IA – May 16-31, 2026

Alluring India 2026

Alluring India 2026

Our Advertisers

  • Battery Rebate australia
  • Bess Australia Solar Panels

Follow Us

  • facebook
  • facebook
  • facebook
  • facebook
INDIA NEWS on YouTube in Australia, bring to our readers and subscribers national and international news, editorials, expert columns, community activities and interviews of political leaders, celebrities, business professionals, academics and sport personalities among others.
  • facebook
  • facebook
  • facebook
  • facebook

Category

  • Accident
  • Adani Australia
  • Advertorial
  • Arts & Culture
  • Ashes 2022
  • Australia

Recent News

  • IPL 2026: Rahul, Ngidi, Kuldeep help DC...
  • IPL 2026: Rahul, Ngidi, Kuldeep help DC...

Subscribe Newsletter

Get the latest creative news from india news

  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer