• About Us
  • Our Editorial Policy
  • Business Directory
  • Advertise with Us
  • Our Advertisers
  • Contact Us
Australia India News
  • Alluring India - Brisbane Banner
India News Australia
  • Home
  • Current Issue
    Past Issue
  • India News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • World
    World This Week
  • Community News
  • What's On
  • Others
    Yoga in Australia News COVID-19 Community News Naari IPL News Health Travel Entertainment
  • Migrants Expo
  • National Events
  • Please wait..
India News News

Relocation of existing HAL facility is not acceptable to K’taka: Minister

  • BY India News Newsdesk
  • May 26, 2025
  • 0 COMMENTS

Bengaluru, May 26 (IANS) Following rumours that Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu has sought for relocation of the Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), the premier defence manufacturing industry run by the Centre and based in Bengaluru, Karnataka Minister for Large and Medium Industries M.B. Patil said on Monday there is nothing wrong in setting up a HAL unit in Andhra, but the relocation of the existing HAL facility is not acceptable.

Minister Patil said that he would soon visit Delhi and meet Defence Minister Rajnath Singh to strongly urge the Centre to grant the Defence Corridor to Karnataka, which the state rightfully deserves.

When asked about emerging reports suggesting that Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu, during a recent NITI Aayog meeting, had requested the relocation of the Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) facility from Bengaluru to his state, Patil said, “CM Naidu is well-versed in this domain. He may have asked for an HAL unit to be set up in his state, and there’s nothing wrong with that. But if he has indeed sought relocation of the existing HAL facility, then that is unacceptable.”

“If Chief Minister Naidu wants to promote industries in his state, he can allot land in Lepakshi or Madakasira — that’s his choice. But I assume that he has not thought of pulling industries away from Karnataka,” he said.

He pointed out that the Central government approved Defence Corridors for Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu two years ago.

“We have no objection to that. But it is unfair not to announce a similar corridor for Karnataka, which contributes 65 per cent to the country’s defence production and ranks third globally in the sector,” Minister Patil stated.

Patil added that when he meets Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, he will also take Karnataka’s union ministers into confidence. Before that, discussions will be held with the Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and the Chief Secretary regarding the developments that reportedly took place during the NITI Aayog meeting, Minister Patil said.

–IANS

mka/dan

Post navigation

ECI announces Rajya Sabha elections for 8 seats, polling on June 19
Illegally transported timber in 61 trucks worth Rs 3.1 crore seized in Manipur

Related Post

‘Laughing Villa’ falls silent as Malayalam actor Salim Kumar passes away
June 7, 2026
Suspected Ebola case in Rajasthan ruled out after NIV report
June 7, 2026
UP boy recovers following complex surgery at Ahmedabad Civil Hospital
June 7, 2026
73 cadets graduate from Army Cadet College, to join IMA in July
June 7, 2026

Our Current Issue

Alluring India 2026

Alluring India 2026

Our Advertisers

  • Battery Rebate australia
  • Bess Australia Solar Panels
  • Alluring India - Brisbane 2026

Follow Us

  • facebook
  • facebook
  • facebook
  • facebook
INDIA NEWS on YouTube in Australia, bring to our readers and subscribers national and international news, editorials, expert columns, community activities and interviews of political leaders, celebrities, business professionals, academics and sport personalities among others.
  • facebook
  • facebook
  • facebook
  • facebook

Category

  • Accident
  • Adani Australia
  • Advertorial
  • Arts & Culture
  • Ashes 2022
  • Australia

Recent News

  • MP League T20 Scindia Cup: Bundelkhand Bulls...
  • ‘Laughing Villa’ falls silent as Malayalam actor...

Subscribe Newsletter

Get the latest creative news from india news

  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer