• About Us
  • Our Editorial Policy
  • Business Directory
  • Advertise with Us
  • Our Advertisers
  • Contact Us
Australia India News
India News Australia
  • Home
  • Current Issue
    Past Issue
  • India News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • World
    World This Week
  • Community News
  • What's On
  • Others
    Yoga in Australia News COVID-19 Community News Naari IPL News Health Travel Entertainment
  • Migrants Expo
  • National Events
  • Please wait..
India News News

SC agrees to hear Jharkhand DGP dispute

  • BY India News Newsdesk
  • July 24, 2025
  • 0 COMMENTS

New Delhi, July 24 (IANS) The Supreme Court on Thursday agreed to urgently list a plea challenging the appointment of Anurag Gupta as the Director General of Police (DGP) of Jharkhand.

After senior advocate Anjana Prakash Gupta mentioned the matter, Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai agreed to list it before a three-judge Bench next week.

The senior counsel said that DGP Gupta was continuing in office in violation of the apex court guidelines in the Prakash Singh vs Union of India case.

According to the judgment, the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) is required to shortlist three eligible IPS officers with clean service records and sufficient residual service from a list submitted by the state. The state government must then appoint one of the shortlisted officers as the DGP, who must be given a minimum tenure of two years.

As per the plea, the Jharkhand government has appointed Gupta, whose name was not on the UPSC-recommended list.

Additionally, it introduced a new rule to appoint Gupta, who was set to retire on April 30, 2025 and granted him an extension until April 2026.

In a letter to the state government, the Union Home Ministry stated that Gupta, having turned 60 in April 2025, stands retired as per All India Services (AIS) rules and cannot continue in service.

The LoP in the Jharkhand Assembly and BJP state chief Babulal Marandi alleged that Gupta, a controversial officer, had previously been suspended for two years due to election-related irregularities. Marandi had moved a contempt plea before the Jharkhand High Court against Gupta’s appointment, citing violations of the apex court’s directive and UPSC guidelines regarding the selection process for the post of DGP.

In an order passed on June 16, the Jharkhand High Court granted another opportunity to the state government and other respondents to submit their responses. Earlier in July 2024, the Hemant Soren-led Jharkhand government had removed former DGP Ajay Kumar Singh before the completion of his two-year tenure. Ajay Kumar Singh was appointed DGP on February 14, 2023, and was due to serve until February 2025, but was removed prematurely.

–IANS

pds/vd

Post navigation

Maruti Suzuki India’s exports rise 17.5 pc, Fronx emerges as most exported SUV
Uproar in Bihar Assembly over SIR; Tejashwi calls minister ‘Monkey’, standoff deepens

Related Post

Bengal Governor gets new secretary, a day after change of power
May 5, 2026
Raghav Chadha arrives at Rashtrapati Bhavan to meet President Murmu
May 5, 2026
Verdict matched with assessment: Himanta Sarma shares poll outcome note
May 5, 2026
Trinamool’s good fight on uneven pitch; will of people supreme: Mahua Moitra
May 5, 2026

Our Current Issue

Australia India News – May 1-15, 2026

Our Advertisers

  • Battery Rebate australia
  • Bess Australia Solar Panels

Follow Us

  • facebook
  • facebook
  • facebook
  • facebook
INDIA NEWS on YouTube in Australia, bring to our readers and subscribers national and international news, editorials, expert columns, community activities and interviews of political leaders, celebrities, business professionals, academics and sport personalities among others.
  • facebook
  • facebook
  • facebook
  • facebook

Category

  • Accident
  • Adani Australia
  • Advertorial
  • Arts & Culture
  • Ashes 2022
  • Australia

Recent News

  • Bengal Governor gets new secretary, a day...
  • ‘I was branded a Test player 10...

Subscribe Newsletter

Get the latest creative news from india news

  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer